Login with Facebook Register | Lost Password
Skip to Content
  • National African American History Month:

    February is National African American History Month! To view websites on African American history, click here.

  • KnowledgeBases:

    MC3's KnowledgeBases are topical collections of information and resources on specific subject areas. To see available KnowledgeBases, click here.

  • Common Core State Standards: MC3 has weblinks on Common Core State Standards, including information on assessment, equity issues, funding, implementation, special populations, and state resources. Check it out here.

KnowledgeBases > The Writing Successful Grants KnowledgeBase > Element 4 > Activity 3 > Task 2: Conduct Internal Review

Guideline:

Following the project team's review, the updated grant proposal should undergo the established internal organizational review. This review offers a fresh perspective on the grant proposal and assures assures the organizational requirements are met. Through this process questions for the funding source may be identified. The internal review should conclude with the proposal receiving formal approval to be submitted.

Checklists Characteristics of a Good Grant Proposal

This checklist may be useful when reviewing the grant proposal prior to submission to the funding source.

Alternate format: PDF

Checklists Checklist for Applicants

This checklist reviews federal grant requirements in regards to supporting documentation and additional forms to be completed. It may be useful when reviewing the grant package prior to submission.

Alternate format: PDF

Tools Grant Proposal Review _EXTERNAL_LINK

This link to grant writing resources at the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education website provides a form for reviewing the completed grant proposal. The form may be useful to grant seekers when reviewing the grant proposal prior to submission to the grant funder.

Tools GrantSAT _EXTERNAL_LINK

GrantSAT (Self-Assessment Tool) is a tool to evaluating each section of a grant proposal. It may be useful for all grant writers from the novice to the highly experienced.

Guidelines Scoring Guidelines - Evaluation Grant Proposals

Each funding source will have a basis for evaluating grant proposals. Utilizing the review criteria and the assigned scoring weights a project team and an internal review team can use the information to evaluate the grant seeker's proposal prior to submission. This document offers a sample scoring scale.

Practical Tips Intent to Submit Form

This document offers an approach for soliciting input from the parties impacted by the grant proposal.

References Office of Research Integrity _EXTERNAL_LINK

This link is to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Research Integrity. Though intended for scientific research grant seekers may find the misconduct resources useful to assure integrity in writing their grant proposals and executing awarded grants.

Print Print this page

Next: Task 3: Resolve Questions with Funding Sources Previous: Task 1: Review with Project Team


The contents of this website were developed under a cooperative agreement from the U.S. Department of Education. The information presented on this website is intended for general reference purposes only, and information/linked content is not necessarily endorsed by the Mid-Continent Comprehensive Center or the U.S. Department of Education.