Login with Facebook Register | Lost Password
Skip to Content
  • National African American History Month:

    February is National African American History Month! To view websites on African American history, click here.

  • KnowledgeBases:

    MC3's KnowledgeBases are topical collections of information and resources on specific subject areas. To see available KnowledgeBases, click here.

  • Common Core State Standards: MC3 has weblinks on Common Core State Standards, including information on assessment, equity issues, funding, implementation, special populations, and state resources. Check it out here.

KnowledgeBases > Scoring Guidelines - Evaluation Grant Proposals

Each funding source will have a basis for evaluating grant proposals. The review criteria will be available in application materials. Utilizing the review criteria and the assigned scoring weights a project team and an internal review team can use the information to evaluate the grant seeker's proposal before prior to submission. 

The U.S. Department of Education will utilize the following general criteria with an allocation of points assigned to each item. When submitting a grant proposal to the U.S. Department of Education be sure that your proposal addresses the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) selection criteria.

Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) Selection Criteria

  1. Meeting the Purposes of the Authorizing Statute
  2. Extent of the Need for the Project
  3. Plan of Operation
  4. Quality of Key Personnel
  5. Budget and Cost Effectiveness
  6. Evaluation Plan
  7. Adequacy of Personnel

Scoring scales used to rate a grant proposal will vary among funding sources. The following table illustrates sample scoring scales along with guidance on evaluating a score's quality. For example the first line represents a total possible score of 25 points, a score of 0-8 would represent a poorly written proposal while a score of 24-25 would rate as an outstanding proposal.

Suggested Scoring Guidelines

Total Poor Weak Adequate Superior Outstanding
25
20
15
10
 5
0-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0-1
9-12
7-9
5-7
3-4
2
13-19
10-15
8-11
5-7
3
20-23
16-18
12-13
8-9
4
24-25
19-20
14-15
10
5

Source:

U.S. Department of Education

Belinda Biscoe, Ph.D., College of Continuing Education, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

Comments

Post Your Comment

Warning! Javascript must be enabled for this function to work properly.

 


The contents of this website were developed under a cooperative agreement from the U.S. Department of Education. The information presented on this website is intended for general reference purposes only, and information/linked content is not necessarily endorsed by the Mid-Continent Comprehensive Center or the U.S. Department of Education.